nearly done

I am reading through the whole thesis. Realised that I could make a point about the results, with one more table, and it is quite a good point and helps draw things together.

Some of the build up chapters seem a bit disjointed in places. It is just that the link to something I have actually done is not made explicit every time, but to do so I feel would make the writing a bit clumsy. I guess it will never look perfect to me, 'cos I made it. A lot of it has already been sanity checked as part of the transfer report, so it can't be awful.

Will have it ready for the supervisors to look at soon, and will get a more objective view. Need to get it handed in.

Busy, Busy

I have started to create a presentation for the GIR workshop later this week. Looks nice, but 20 minutes seems a long time to talk for a 2 page paper. We'll see how it goes, I guess there will be questions too.I am also looking forward to skiing, it's been a while since I did anything but writing or dog training.

The PhD took a great step towards being a finished document last week because I sorted out all the references. They are now in Word 2007.There were various problems with the xslt files I found for Harvard style. I found 4 different ones and none of them matched Sheffield's version. furthermore none of them can do author (year) as opposed to (author, year). So I spent some of my time fixing those. I still need to finally finish the results chapter, though it looks much better.

struggling on

Writing a PhD is like a marathon they said when I started. And so it turns out. Luckily I did not do what I did in the Sheffield marathon in 2000 and rush off too fast. Thus I am not completely fed up with the thing. I have to finish the results chapter by the end of the month, which is feasible. I also need to tidy up lots of earlier stuff, but I have mostly got it too a point where there are islands that I either re-write or just remove depending on how long I have. So I am getting there.

Off to Switzerland next week for a workshop, and a couple of days skiing.

Slow but steady

This document is slowly starting to look like a PhD. It was supposed to do that before Christmas, but some personal things got in the way. I handed in a draft anyway, which was a vast improvement on previous attempts, but not finished in any way really. Anyway, I now seem to be adding about 600-1000 words per day that explain things a bit more clearly, as per comments from my supervisor. It still looks a bit like 4 separate experiments, which to some extent it is, but I will work on showing how these are linked (which they are).

New year

Well it's been a busy new year. No drinkies on NYE as Maggie got a virus. I got it the following day. The effects are just about gone for both of us.

I've had to go down to Kent and discharge my Mum. She seems fine now, but we will see.

It has been snowing a bit. Not really caused me any problems as most of the time I work from home, and the internet has stayed up all the time.

I have completed my marking. The electronic hand in has been interesting. At first the office printed it, the lead tutor photocopied it and put it on my desk (now in B&w). When I got it home I found there were two copies of one assignment (it transpired that 5 had been handed in by that group). There was also one missing. In the ones that appeared ok to start with some of the diagrams did not print. I got electronic copies and one still has diagrams missing, I'm not sure if this is the offices fault or the students. It has taken more of my time than it should have to sort all this out. Still at least I'm paid for it.

I am awaiting full comments from my supervisors, but already have some from my first supervisor. I can fully familiarise myself with what I have so far, and try to get a bit more polish on it. As 1st supervisor points out, many bit of the thesis are not finished.

Rob.

63613 words

and most of them in the right order.

today's error

I am losing the will to live! All I want to do is write, but I keep finding minor errors in my data. So frustrating, but hopefully I am catching all the errors.

Today's blooper. In the distance to region centre I got the centroid wrong for Sheffield City Centre (fat fingers), thus all the refs were about 200 miles away in a big hump on the graph. Great there is a hump, but why over there? Duly corrected and now must run 4 sets of data off, then accumulate it then run the reports perform all the changes to get an excel chart that can actually be read (esp in b&w), and put it in the document. Then I can start thinking about what it means.

At least there are only 4 vernacular regions not 200 like with the administrative regions, so it is quicker to correct.

Rob.